From the desk of Naturopath Adrian Jones

People often ask me, “What is the best cancer cure for…(such and such a cancer)”?  The problem is that there appears to be so many, from all accounts.  A confusing number, to be precise!

Accounts by people who have healed themselves with such and such a thing, be it a special diet, a particular protocol, some mysterious cure that has seen them cancer free now for many years.  What to make of it all?

Reputedly, since Dr Otto Warburg’s discovery of the biochemistry of a cancer cell, for which work he won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1931, many alternative cures have been lauded, from Vitamin B17 (laetrile), mega-dose ascorbic acid (Vit C), the Breuss Diet, the Johanna Budwig diet, Dr Kelley’s Metabolic Therapy, St John of God, the Gerson clinics, and more recently Cesium chloride therapy.

However, it seems very few cures, if indeed any at all, are coming from medical oncology, despite amazing technological advances in diagnosis and treatments. As a percentage of the population, just as many people are dying from cancer today as they did back 40 years ago, before the so-called “war on cancer” had begun.  Maybe it’s even worse today.  Certainly more of us are getting cancer.

Are they actually looking for cures, even?  Just a question.  Why has alternative medicine seemingly come up with so many, without the huge financial resources that allopathic medicine enjoys (the $trillions).  Have you stopped to ask that question yet?  Maybe you already know why.

So your question was my question, what might be the most effective today?  Where can I reasonably and reliably direct my patients, to give them the best possible chance of healthy life?This is what I discovered, and have since researched.  You be the judge!!  You have the right to choose your own destiny in Australia (still, thank God)!

The following is excerpted entirely from www.cancertutor.com, possibly the world’s most comprehensive and informative educational web site on all the alternative cancer treatments and cures.  It has to do with what is known as the cesium chloride pH therapy, also known as alkali therapy, and high pH therapy.

“FAQ - What is the Cesium Chloride Cure Rate?

“Sometimes when a person hears that a cesium chloride clinic has a "cure rate" of 50% they become concerned that cesium chloride is dangerous or not effective. The answer to this concern is somewhat complex so don't skip anything in this article.

“Cesium chloride is frequently combined with other treatments, such as DMSO, coral calcium, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), ozone, etc. Cesium chloride is clearly the most popular alternative cancer treatment, among alternative cancer treatment experts, for cancer patients who have been sent home to die. And therein lies one of the secrets to understanding statistics.

“First of all, understand that virtually 100% of cancer patients who are treated with orthodox treatments (e.g. surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, interferon, etc.) go to orthodox medicine FIRST, meaning their first cancer treatments are orthodox.

“However, quite a different picture emerges for alternative medicine. The vast majority of people on alternative cancer treatments had been on orthodox treatments BEFORE they even started their alternative cancer treatment.

“This puts alternative medicine at a severe disadvantage. First, the cancer patients who are sent home to die by orthodox medicine, and THEN start an alternative cancer treatment, have been severely damaged by orthodox medicine. It would literally take 50 pages to describe the different kinds of damage (called "side-effects") done by orthodox medicine to cancer patients. See the Dr. Lorraine Day, M.D. tape: "Cancer Doesn't Scare Me Anymore" for more details.

“Second, very valuable time has been lost while the patient was on orthodox treatments. Months, and in many cases years, have been lost to the alternative cancer practitioners to treat the patient. The disadvantage that alternative cancer practitioners work under is absolutely incomprehensible.

“Most people who use alternative cancer treatments have been sent home to die by orthodox medicine, then they decide to look into alternative cancer treatments, because they "have nothing to lose."

“Because of this, and because the experts almost universally use cesium chloride on highly advanced cancer patients, there is a severe bias in the class of patients who use cesium chloride. In other words, cesium chloride is almost exclusively used on advanced cancer patients who have been through the complete range of orthodox treatments of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation, and perhaps others.

“Another reason for saying cesium chloride is almost exclusively used on advanced cancer patients is that cesium chloride is a complex treatment because a cancer patient has to monitor their potassium, and perhaps deal with other things, such as inflammation or nausea.

“For these reasons, for cancer patients who do not go to orthodox medicine first, but rather go to alternative medicine first, cesium chloride is generally not the first choice of practitioners. There are plenty of effective alternative cancer treatments for patients who have not been through surgery, chemotherapy and radiation which are easy to use and very effective.
“When alternative cancer practitioners do not use cesium chloride for their advanced patients who have been through orthodox treatments, their cure rates are generally poor. But statistics can be tricky.

“For example, Dr. Donald (William) Kelley had a 93% overall cure rate for treating cancer patients. This is NOT the bogus "5-year cure rate" of orthodox medicine, but a true cure rate.

“However, what many people fail to remember is that Kelley did not include in his statistics any advanced cancer patient who died within 18 months of starting his treatment. In other words, if Kelley started working on a cancer patient sent home to die by orthodox medicine, he did not count this patient in his statistics unless he or she lived for at least 18 months after starting the Dr. Kelley treatment.

“A similar story can be told about laetrile. For example, Dr. Philip Binzel did not count advanced cancer patients in his statistics unless they lived for at least one year after beginning his laetrile treatment.

“Thus, when looking at the statistics for treating advanced cancer patients a person must know exactly what statistical techniques are being used.

“For example, Gerson had a 50% cure rate, however, he counted EVERY patient that came to him, even if they died within the first month. Over 90% of Gerson's patients were advanced and terminal. It may be that the Gerson cure rate of 50% was actually more impressive than the 93% cure rate of Kelley, if you understand the way they did their statistics!! The bad thing about the Gerson treatment is that is was administered by an M.D. and it was (is) a very complex and rigid treatment.

“Now let us talk about the Dr. Sartori cesium chloride (and I think he also used ozone) study in 1981. Let me quote from Dr. Howenstein's article:

• "Dr. H. E. Sartori began his cesium cancer therapy program in April 1981 at Life Sciences Universal Medical Clinics in Rockville, Md. Fifty patients with widespread metastatic tumor deposits were treated. Forty-seven of these 50 patients had already completed maximal modalities of treatment, i.e. surgery, radiation, multiple courses of chemotherapy before cesium was tried. Their condition was hopeless.
  
  
• Approximately 50 % of patients with breast, colon, prostate, pancreas and lung cancer survived. Three patients were comatose when the therapy was initiated. Thirteen patients died in the first 2 weeks of therapy. Autopsy results in each of these 13 disclosed reduction in tumor mass size caused by cesium therapy. Also pain disappeared in all patients within 1 to 3 days after initiation of cesium therapy. This may have reflected decreased production of lactic acid by dying cancer cells." http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james14.htm (recommended reading - AJ)

“I did not quote the entire article, but note that 47 of 50 patients were "hopeless" and 3 of the 47 were in a coma before the study was begun. His 50% cure rate for certain types of cancer was astonishing!!

“Given that cesium chloride is generally only used for the more advanced cancer patients, and given that some clinics include ALL of their patients in their statistics, a 50% cure rate for cesium chloride is actually amazing!!

“Now let us suppose there was some magical cancer cure that removed EVERY cancer cell from the body of a cancer patient within 24 hours, even for the most advanced cancer patients.

“What some people don't realize is that even if such a magical treatment existed it would probably only have a 60% to 65% cure rate of advanced, terminal cancer patients. Why? Because many people released by orthodox medicine cannot be saved because they have a vital organ that has been damaged beyond repair, they have so much damage to non-cancerous cells that they cannot be saved (even if all of their cancer cells were removed), they have such a severe case of cachexia (i.e. malnutrition), and so on.

“In other words, many of the cancer patients released by orthodox medicine are going to die, even if you could safely remove every cancer cell in their body within 24 hours of being released.

“In summary, the 50% cure rate of using cesium chloride on advanced, terminal cancer patients is the best reliable cure rate I have ever heard of for advanced, terminal patients, where all of the patients are included in the study statistics, for ANY alternative or orthodox cancer treatment.

“Remember, the cure rate of these patients by orthodox medicine is close to ZERO percent. Remember also that alternative medicine is dealing with a severely damaged patient and alternative medicine has lost months or years of treatment time to orthodox medicine.

“On the other hand, those who use cesium chloride FIRST, instead of orthodox medicine first, and do not lose any time to orthodox treatments, have a very high chance of survival, most likely around 95% if they do their homework and keep to their strict cancer diet!!

One of the main people in cesium chloride therapy is Larry of Essense of Life in the USA, specializing in the immune systems of folk with serious internal cancers.

I was led to his work because of the bio-chemistry of what is being done with cesium chloride therapy (also known as alkali therapy, also pH therapy).  Of course, healing is a wholistic thing, and extends to all relationships, not just to our body, but to the world around us, to our loved ones, church or club, work environment, and the physical world we live in, and of course to the universe in which we find ourselves members, which bespeaks spiritual relationships as well. 

But even the good stuff like cesium chloride therapy works more effectively when one is consuming the right foods and fluids, and not the ones that will slow down healing.  One’s relationship to oneself has a lot to do with eating and drinking (and thinking) right. 

If you would like some guidance having read from www.cancertutor.com, and you are concerned about your direction, please make a booking enquiry by ‘clicking here’ or phone on +61 7 5522 7711 for an appointment.